Cases 61 - 70 of 119
USA v. Maurice Nichol
as 13-3670
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE NICHOLS, aka Michael Peterson
BROTHERS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMS B. BROTHERS, JR.
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. WARREN et al
as 2:2013cv04250
Petitioner:
WILLIE PETERSON
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warren Peterson v. Collins, et al
as 13-2835
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN T. PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT COLLINS, SUPERINTENDENT and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
PETERSON v. COLLINS et al
as 2:2013cv02054
Petitioner:
WARREN T. PETERSON
Respondent:
COLLINS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawn Ball v. Lamas, et al
as 12-2747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
LAMAS, WRIGHT, NOONAN, C/O and others
Muwsa Green v. Philadelphia County Prison Men
as 12-2421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUWSA GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON MENTAL HEALTH UNIT, BUFFER, BALTIMORE, Correction Officer and others
PETERSON v. CAPE MAY CCC et al
as 1:2012cv02545
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PETERSON
Defendant:
CAPE MAY CCC, SERGEANT LIENGER, WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PISERCHIA v. BERGEN COUNTY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2012cv02520
Plaintiff:
FRANCESCO PISERCHIA
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY POLICE DEPT., SAHEED BAKSH, JEFFREY ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawn Ball v. Powley, et al
as 12-1940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
POWLEY, SISLEY, T. PETERSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
