Cases 61 - 70 of 154
Briddell v. McDonald et al
as 1:2013cv00611
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Briddell
Defendant:
Lawrence McDonald, Rick Catts and CCS Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'BRIEN et al v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2013cv00299
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN and INMATES OF BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON , PROPRIETORS OF BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, BUTLER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
George Jackson v. Keith Ivens, et al
as 12-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE A. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M.D. KEITH IVENS, PRISON HEALTH SER INC, STANLEY TAYLOR and others
LUEVANO v. PERRY et al
as 2:2012cv05602
Petitioner:
JAIME LUEVANO
Respondent:
RICK PERRY, GREG ABBOTT, TEXAS SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUGHES v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv04968
Plaintiff:
RICK HUGHES
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY, JOHN DOE MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REESE v. HAMMOND et al
as 3:2012cv03035
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM REESE
Defendant:
MATT HAMMOND, PAT FLEMING, RICK GRIPPALDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. GRIPPALDI et al
as 3:2012cv03036
Plaintiff:
THEODORE GREEN
Defendant:
RICK GRIPPALDI, PAT FLEMING, MATT HAMMOND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Sciarra v. DeRose et al
as 1:2011cv01945
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mark Sciarra
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols, Rick Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
