Cases 71 - 80 of 164
STEVENS v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv01577
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. STEVENS
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, FREDRICK MILLER, PAULA AIGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ADAMI et al
as 3:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
BLAIR JONES
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMI, JOHN DOE, DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fiorletta v. Young et al
as 1:2018cv00528
Plaintiff:
Lisa Fiorletta
Defendant:
Nicole Young, R.N., Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Lesley J. Blair-Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FETTERMAN v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS DAVID FETTERMAN
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BRUCE R. ERB, TERRY TOMASSETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. John Blair
as 17-3693
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WESLEY BLAIR
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv02180
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, Michael Wenerowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01827
Plaintiff:
Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaVelle Richardson v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 17-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVELLE D. RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY
BRITTON v. CITY OF ATLANTIC et al
as 1:2017cv01986
Plaintiff:
LONNIE BRITTON
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC, YOLANDA SHABAZZ, STEPHEN RANDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KURTZ v. ALTOONA PA POLICE et al
as 3:2016cv00236
Petitioner:
ROBERT F. KURTZ
Respondent:
ALTOONA PA POLICE and BLAIR COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
