Cases 71 - 80 of 128
Davis v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00370
Plaintiff:
Angelo Lenell Davis
Defendant:
PA Department of Corrections, Laurel Harry, Jan Digby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLAMY v. BONHAM et al
as 1:2015cv08520
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BELLAMY
Defendant:
M BONHAM, TURNER, T TRUITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLAMY v. BONHAM et al
as 2:2015cv08520
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BELLAMY
Defendant:
M BONHAM, TURNER, T TRUITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. SMITH et al
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
RYAN BLACK
Defendant:
KIM SMITH and HEATHER G. MCKEEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYO v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MAYO
Defendant:
KENNETH CAMERON, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, PEGGY BAUGHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 2:2015cv01085
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, JEREMY STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCRAY v. PENNELL et al
as 3:2015cv05913
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MCCRAY
Defendant:
ARTHUR PENNELL, ANDREW CHENCHARIK, J. PUTKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA) et al
as 2:2015cv00619
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (PENNSYLVANIA), SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Walker v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI, et al
as 15-1178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI, DORETTA CHENCHARICK, Supt. Asst./Grievance Coordinator, SCI Houtzdale, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DIEHL and others
CHRISTOPHER v. CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON
as 3:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
COREY L. CHRISTOPHER
Defendant:
CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON, JOHN PREBISH, PRIMECARE MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
