Cases 71 - 80 of 1,217
MARTIN v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
HASSAN MARTIN
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY, WARDEN JOHN LANKEY, SGT. ANTHONY DRAGONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Jones v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
JONES v. WAHL et al
as 2:2023cv02589
Petitioner:
JAMAL JONES
Respondent:
MR MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. PABON et al
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
CHCA EDWARDS, DR. BAIRD, PA STROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. NOGAN et al
as 1:2023cv03416
Petitioner:
HECTOR L. JONES
Respondent:
PATRICK A. NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcellus Jones v. Robert Gilmore, et al
as 23-1999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT GILMORE, DENISE SMITH, JAMES BRESHAHN and others
JONES v. BALLTYNE et al
as 5:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
BYRON MASON JONES, JR.
Defendant:
LT. BALLTYNE, C.O. BAROFSKI, LT. POLDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. FABIAN et al
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Defendant:
FABIAN and FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WALTERS et al
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
DAVON JONES and CORDELL YOUNG
Defendant:
SERGEANT WALTERS and SERGEANT HEIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Jones v. USA
as 23-1967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY A. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
