Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Timothy Smith v. United States District Court
as 12-2376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02499
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02402
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Richard Tagliamonte v. Walley Wang, et al
as 12-1130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD TAGLIAMONTE
Defendant - Appellee:
WESLEY WANG, United States Postal Inspector, individually personally and in his official capacity, SCOTT MATHEWS, United States Postal Inspector individually personally and in his official capacity, CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, United States Attorney individually personally and in his official capacity and others
SMITH v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 1:2012cv00019
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY L. SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
as 3:2011cv07147
Petitioner:
GADIEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PRALL v. WOLFSON et al
as 1:2011cv05696
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
FREDA L. WOLFSON, LOIS H. GOODMAN and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv05572
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN BARACK OBAMA ADMINISTRATOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3161
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
