Cases 71 - 80 of 134
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (OTTO KRUPP)
as 1:2011cv04035
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
OTTO KRUPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2011cv04306
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS LLOYD
Respondent:
BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Dauphin County Commissioners et al
as 1:2011cv01240
Plaintiff:
Victor Lloyd Mitchell
Defendant:
Dauphin County Commissioners, Jeffrey T. Haste, Michael Pries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Salameh, et al
as 11-2535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON PAUL LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAWAD SALAMEH, Medical Doctor at SCI Laurel Highlands, PA DEPT CORR, JEFFREY BEARD and others
LLOYD v. SALAMEH et al
as 3:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
AARON PAUL LLOYD
Defendant:
JAWAD A. SALAMEH, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BAYSIDE LITIGATION (ERROLL BURNETT)
as 1:2011cv01471
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
ERROLL BURNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LLOYD v. SHARTLE
as 1:2011cv01419
Petitioner:
ERIC C LLOYD
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DOCKERY v. BLEDSOE
as 3:2011cv00430
Petitioner:
JASPER LLOYD DOCKERY
Respondent:
Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LLOYD v. DR. JAWAD A. SALAMEH et al
as 3:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
AARON PAUL LLOYD
Defendant:
DR. JAWAD A. SALAMEH, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00673
Petitioner:
Lloyd Reid
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
