Cases 81 - 90 of 116
Freeman v. USA
as 1:2012cv01047
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James Freeman v. John Kerestes, et al
as 12-2608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NICHOLAS FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. KERESTES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
MAYS v. FREEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv03179
Petitioner:
RONALD MAYS
Respondent:
ROBERT FREEMAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FREEMAN v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2012cv01630
Plaintiff:
AKEEM FREEMAN
Defendant:
ERIC M. TAYLOR and THE MUNICIPALITY OF CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2012cv01044
Plaintiff:
AKEEM FREEMAN
Defendant:
THERESA MCLAUGHLIN, FRANCINA PENDERGRASS, KELLY TESTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2012cv00155
Petitioner:
JAMES NICOLAS FREEMAN
Respondent:
JOHN W. KERESTES , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Freeman v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 11-1972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NICHOLAS FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPT CORR
James Freeman v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 11-1727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES NICHOLAS FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPT CORR
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
STUDLACK, ANN M. BATDORF, BOWERS, OFFICER and others
HARPER v. BEFONTI et al
as 2:2011cv01616
Plaintiff:
MAURICE HARPER
Defendant:
KARL J. BEFONTI, MARK KIRBY, ISMAEL CRUZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery Simms v. Harry Freeman, et al
as 11-1349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY ALONZO SIMMS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY FREEMAN, M.A. Dr., ROBERT DONNA BURNS, ROGERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
