Cases 1 - 10 of 27
USA v. Ronald Vines
as 23-2843
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD DEWITT VINES
VINES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv02343
Plaintiff:
RONALD DEWITT VINES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BEY v. KAMPERT et al
as 2:2020cv00584
Petitioner:
MELLONZO BEY
Respondent:
FREDERICK KAMPERT and CORPORAL DEWITT
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDERS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA, PA et al
as 2:2019cv05856
Defendant:
ROSSMAN DEWITT THOMPSON, JR., FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDERS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA, PA, DOE 1, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GEORGE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. FAYETTE CO. PRISON et al
as 2:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. RUSSELL
Defendant:
FAYETTE CO. PRISON , BRIAN MILLER , ROBERT MICHAEL, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEWITT v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06555
Plaintiff:
WARREN DEWITT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEWITT v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06511
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY DEWITT
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYNES v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2016cv00285
Plaintiff:
DARRYL LEE HAYNES
Defendant:
TRP. MICHEAL THOMPSON, CPL. MICHEAL IRWIN and OFF DELBERT DEWITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfonso Pew v. Joanne Torma, et al
as 14-3716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANNE TORMA, DAVE ROBERTS, T'SHANNA KYLER and others
PEW v. TORMA et al
as 2:2014cv00984
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOANNE TORMA, DAVE ROBERTS, T'SHANNA KYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
