Cases 1 - 10 of 1,178
SIMS et al v. HARRY
as 2:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
AARON V. SIMS and DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL R. HARRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POSEY v. PARROTT
as 2:2024cv05460
Plaintiff:
H. TORY POSEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY M. PARROTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher West v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1611
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER H. WEST
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
COTTON v. MCCAFFRY
as 2:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
MCCAFFRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TROY et al v. KUHN
as 1:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN TROY, JAVON HALL, ALDO NAVAS and others
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHNS, COMMISSIONER VICTORIA L. KUHN and JOHN AND JANE DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Booher et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marvin Banks, Running River, Dale Arnold and others
Defendant:
Superintendent Bradley Booher, Head Chaplain Henry Hansard, Tracy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUBOSE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv03784
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUBOSE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2024cv03768
Petitioner:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick Banks v. BOP, et al
as 24-1478
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NOBLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv02324
Petitioner:
WILLIAM H. NOBLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
