Cases 1 - 10 of 23
SALAZAR v. PETERS et al
as 3:2023cv00275
Petitioner:
ALFREDO SALAZAR
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, BOP COLETTE PETERS, WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SALAZAR v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 3:2019cv00215
Petitioner:
AMAURY SALAZAR
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SALAZAR v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2018cv11185
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Petitioner:
ALBERTO SALAZAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salazar v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff:
George Salazar
Defendant:
United States Of America, David J. Ebbert and Alama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SALAZAR v. STEM et al
as 2:2016cv07092
Plaintiff:
JUAN SALAZAR
Defendant:
ERICA STEM, MERRIL MAIN, LT. D DAYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEGAY v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2016cv00800
Plaintiff:
IVAN RAY BEGAY
Defendant:
HOLLINGSWORTH, SALAZAR and REYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. RAIBIL et al
as 2:2016mc00080
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
RAIBIL, KRISTIN VACSULKA, RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLER v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv05518
Plaintiff:
MARK MILLER
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, MCCOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BANKS v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 2:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Banks v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Landya McCafferty, Joseph N. Laplante, Steven J. McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
