Cases 1 - 10 of 16
THOMPSON v. SLATZER et al
as 1:2019cv00282
Defendant:
LISA SLATZER and REX HILDEBRAND
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
THOMPSON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00397
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, DR. COMONCHO and DR. RENBERG
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON and HYDEE ESTA RENEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THOMPSON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00308
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, DR. COMONCHO and DR. RENBERG
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARTER v. CHARLES
as 2:2016cv04848
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RAY CARTER
Respondent:
CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMPSON v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Defendant:
DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and MICHAEL D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2014cv00226
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MR. M. OVERMEIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv03875
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KEITH A. PESTO, KIM R. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KEITH A. PESTO, KIM R. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. GIROUX et al
as 3:2014cv00004
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX , NORMAN A. KRUMENACKER, III and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spears v. Palakovich et al
as 1:2013cv01824
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Spears
Respondent:
John A. Palakovich and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
