Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
BREWER v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01203
Plaintiff: DONTE BREWER
Defendant: JOHN DOE, -. OWENS, B. J. SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BOOZER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00047
Defendant: THERESE CANTOLINA, BARRY A. SMITH, MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Plaintiff: RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. JOHNSONM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01250
Petitioner: ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Respondent: B. J. JOHNSONM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Kates v. Joe King, et al
as 12-1835
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID E. KATES
Defendant - Appellee: JOE KING, U.S.P, R. J. WHITTEN, U.S.P.O Chief, L. CUNNINGHAM, U.S.P. Lewisburg Supervising Attorney and others
Christopher DeSavage v. J. Stuller, et al
as 11-1645
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER J. DESAVAGE
Defendant - Appellee: J. STULLER, B. CORBIN, J. D. FISHER and others
Owens v. Lawler et al
as 3:2010cv00849
Plaintiff: Anthony Owens
Defendant: R.M. Lawler, Connie Green, B. J. Hollibaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeSavage v. Stuller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00205
Petitioner: Christopher J. DeSavage
Respondent: J. Stuller, B. Corbin, J. D. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purcell Bronson v. B. Beaven, et al
as 08-3981
Plaintiff - Appellant: PURCELL BRONSON
Defendant: B. J. BEAVEN, UNDERWOOD and MICHAEL LUCAS, Esq.
WALKER v. GEORGE W. HILL CORR. FACILITY et al
as 2:2007cv02663
Plaintiff: GODFREY B. WALKER
Defendant: GEORGE W. HILL CORR. FACILITY, RONALD NARDOLILLO, B. J. PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?