Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Myers v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Rayti Myers
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Miranda Brechbiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bettis v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
Eric Bettis
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Buchanan, Captain Line and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson et al v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
Russell J. Nelson, Dustin Oncay, Matthew Creveling and others
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Mike Buchanan, Captain John Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEFAZIO v. DOWNING et al
as 2:2023cv03307
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEFAZIO, BETTY DOWNING, MARCELINO ARCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joseph v. Betti et al
as 1:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Stanley R. Joseph
Respondent:
Tim Betti and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 State Petn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Sewell v. Betti et al
as 1:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Paul Sewell
Defendant:
Tim Betti, Lackawanna County Prison Board, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tisdale v. Tim Betti, et al
as 22-2755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES J. TISDALE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM BETTI, Warden, WELLPATH MEDICAL, DR. AMED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
