Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Bragg v. USA
as 1:2023cv01881
Petitioner:
Michael Bragg
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LOYOLA v. CHUTKAN et al
as 2:2023cv03814
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL LOYOLA
Defendant:
TANA CHUTKAN, RON DESANTIS, MOISHE MANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILCOX v. CUMBERLAND CO. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2022cv04672
Plaintiff:
PERRY A. WILCOX
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND CO. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, EUGENE J. CALDWELL, II, CAPTAIN BRAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2022cv04340
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LAWSON
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, DIR. OSCAR AVILES, LT. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAGG v. PILLAI et al
as 2:2020cv00581
Defendant:
DR. PUSHKALAI PILLAI, ROBERT GILMORE, TRACY SHAWLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK N. BRAGG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SANDERS v. BRAGG
as 2:2019cv18576
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG
Petitioner:
LAMAR SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brian Bragg, et al v. Charles Ellis, et al
as 17-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG, on behalf himself and similar situated inmates
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NAQUAN JOHNSON, NATHAN MERRICK and DYWON NOCH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES ELLIS, Warden, BRIAN M. HUGHES, County Executive and ERIC GREENBERG
BRAGG v. KENDALL et al
as 2:2017cv13157
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
ALFRED KENDALL and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Bragg v. Joseph Tuccillo
as 17-3615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH TUCCILLO, Deputy Mercer County Sheriff's Department
Brian Bragg v. Francis Meo, et al
as 17-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. FRANCIS MEO, MD and NURSES JANE ROES 1-3, At Northern State Prison Medical Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
