Cases 1 - 10 of 53
SCHWAGER v. BEILEY et al
as 2:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES SCHWAGER, ADAM CHARLES and CHASE SCHWAGER
Defendant:
MATTHEW BEILEY and AMER WILLIAM WHITFEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
CHASE v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
WESLEY CHASE
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeShawn Chase v. Attorney General Delaware, et al
as 23-2646
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESHAWN CHASE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
CRAVENER v. MCCLISTER et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. CRAVENER, SR.
Defendant:
JUDGE CHASE MCCLISTER, ASST DISTRICT ATTORN REBECCA LOZZI, WARDEN JESSICA HICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RAJAB et al v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv00774
Defendant:
MATAEO GARNER, WESTMORELAND COUNTY, NICOLE KAMER and others
Plaintiff:
IEESHA RAJAB and T. D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILEY v. US GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
DANA W. WILEY
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT, ASSIST. SUPER. WILLIAM BARR, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CREWS v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH CREWS
Defendant:
DAVID ANDERSON, RAQUEL DESTEFANO, MARK CHASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMMOND v. ACERNO et al
as 2:2021cv03688
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAMMOND
Defendant:
THOMAS ACERNO, CHRISTOPHER CHASE, DAVID HELPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
