Cases 1 - 10 of 1,704
JONES v. DODSON et al
as 1:2024cv06105
Plaintiff:
MALIK S. JONES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DODSON, JAMES HERBERT, JAMES BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DERRICK v. FINAN et al
as 1:2024cv05637
Plaintiff:
OSH-SHAKKUR A. DERRICK
Defendant:
CAPTAIN THOMAS F. FINAN, SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER A. SOUTHARD and SOMERS POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Robert Reed v. Commissioner United States Parole Commission, et al
as 24-1687
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED, a/k/a Robert Andrew Bey
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and CHRISTOPHER WHITMER, U.S. Parole Examiner Employee
ZAPOLSKI v. GODEK et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. ZAPOLSKI
Defendant:
TROOPER RONALD GODEK, TROOPER KENT LOUCKS, GREGORY REICHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah Moore v. C. Minerva, et al
as 24-1669
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MOORE
Defendant:
C. MINERVA, Corrections Officer, SGT. BAKER and CHRISTOPHER PETTINE
BENNETT v. BLOCKER et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BENNETT
Defendant:
SGT. BLOCKER, MS. MILLS and SUPT. HAINSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
