Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Keith Gant v. Sean Marler, et al
as 22-1396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH GANT
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN MARLER, Warden, MRS. KNOX, A.W., MARISSA NASH and others
GANT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv17766
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOWARD GANT, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, DR. NEAL JONES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANT v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv00821
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
KALIF V. GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STOKES v. DENSON et al
as 1:2019cv20663
Defendant:
TAWANA GANT, LT. ZIMMERMAN, DAVID KELSEY and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE STOKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANT v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv05177
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSLYVANIA and others
Petitioner:
KALIF V. GANT and MR. KALIF V. GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANT v. MARLER et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
JEFFREY NASH, MICHAEL W. CARROLL, MRS. KNOX and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH GANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv13931
Defendant:
PEPPER, WILLIE BONDS, HIGGINS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalif Gant v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 17-2559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KALIF GANT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
GANT v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2017cv00046
Petitioner:
JERRY L. GANT
Respondent:
THOMPSON and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gant v. Thompson et al
as 3:2016cv02310
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Gant
Respondent:
Thompson and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
