Cases 1 - 10 of 38
RAFFENSBERGER v. STEBERGER
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
WARREN HARDING RAFFENSBERGER
Respondent:
CHERYL STEBERGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RAFFENSBERGER v. LANCASTER PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
as 5:2023cv04963
Plaintiff:
WARREN HARDING RAFFENSBERGER
Defendant:
LANCASTER PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Nicholas et al
as 1:2022cv01884
Plaintiff:
Trina Gordon
Defendant:
Wendy Nicholas, William Frantz, Nichole McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan Harding v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 22-1296
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN HARDING
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
HARDING v. WARDEN MASON OF SCI MAHANOY et al
as 5:2021cv02393
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYVANIA, WARDEN MASON OF SCI MAHANOY and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON
Petitioner:
JAMES HARDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harding v. Ransom et al
as 3:2019cv01882
Respondent:
Kevin J. Ransom and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ryan Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GHOLSON v. SHEEDER et al
as 2:2018cv01451
Defendant:
YOLANDA S. WEBB, LEE J. ESTOCK, FOGLE and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PAYNE v. WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2018cv00239
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI MCKEAN
Petitioner:
HARDING LEE PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
THOMAS v. SHAFFER et al
as 2:2018cv00401
Plaintiff:
DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER B. SHAFFER, LT. M. THOMAS, CAPT. HARDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
GARTOR KIKI BROWN
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY, CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFF JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
