Cases 1 - 10 of 6,264
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
CURRY v. IMAN et al
as 1:2024cv06556
Plaintiff:
LAQUANE CURRY
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. IMAN, OFFICER A. VELEZ, SERGEANT M. DEHARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mojica-Carrion v. Smith
as 4:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Leonardo J. Mojica-Carrion
Defendant:
Eric D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1952
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
COLM F. CONNOLLY, COLLINS J. SEITZ and SHANE TROXLER
STRADER v. PRESENZA et al
as 1:2024cv06398
Plaintiff:
SHAWN R. STRADER
Defendant:
LOUIS J. PRESENZA, ERIN YERKE and OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIMBERLAKE v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN TIMBERLAKE
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID J. CLOSE, JAMES JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNING v. PLATKIN et al
as 2:2024cv06144
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MANNING
Defendant:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, MARCUS OHICKS, PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKSTONE v. PLATKIN et al
as 3:2024cv06127
Petitioner:
CLEVESTER BLACKSTONE
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, N.J. STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, N.J. STATE GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. DODSON et al
as 1:2024cv06105
Plaintiff:
MALIK S. JONES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DODSON, JAMES HERBERT, JAMES BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
