Cases 1 - 10 of 1,236
JONES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv09294
Petitioner:
JAMES EMORY JONES
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv03057
Defendant:
JOSEPH TERRA, JOSEPH WALSH, ANTHONY LETIZIO and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00147
Defendant:
JOE GIGLIOTTI, R. BRAINIFF, ROSS and others
Plaintiff:
MS. JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2322
Defendant:
SGT HUNT, State Trooper, LT DIEHL, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFIELDER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Defendant:
R. BOLLINGER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R.A. SETH JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCBRIDE v. LAURIE et al
as 2:2024cv04178
Defendant:
OKEEFE, LAYTOYA JONES, RYAN WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
CUSHMIR MCBRIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv02862
Defendant:
EDWARDS JONES, LAKEYSHA COOPER and MARCOS ORTIZ
Plaintiff:
CORDIRO BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. ALTEMUS et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
C.O. J. JONES, Lieutenant S. Woomer and JON ALTEMUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deandre Jones v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 24-2158
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY INDIANA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE PAYTON JONES
CLARK v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Defendant:
ZAKEN, JONES, KOLIK and others
Plaintiff:
KENNY and KENNETH DOUGLAS CLARK, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
