Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JONES v. FISHER et al
as 3:2020cv00054
Plaintiff:
ERIC K. JONES
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINESWORTH and AMBER FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GIBSON v. COBURN et al
as 2:2015cv04335
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant:
D. COBURN, K. JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. COBURN et al
as 1:2015cv04335
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant:
D. COBURN, K. JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. COBURN et al
as 2:2015cv03026
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBSON
Defendant:
D COBURN, K JONES, RAMIREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levar Jones v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 15-1830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVAR K. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Levar Jones v. Superintendent Smithfield SCI, et al
as 14-1975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVAR K. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SMITHFIELD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
JONES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2013cv00132
Petitioner:
BYRON K. JONES, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. FISHER et al
as 2:2011cv06705
Petitioner:
LEVAR K. JONES
Respondent:
JOHN FISHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POOLE v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER et al
as 3:2011cv03730
Plaintiff:
MARCELLO POOLE
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER, L. KLOSINSKI, K. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford Jones v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 09-1709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADFORD K. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS, Warden and ATTY GEN DE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
