Cases 1 - 10 of 585
Joseph v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv01532
Defendant:
Faith Walter, Michael Dunkle, Terri Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Carrington K. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIGGS v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv04827
Defendant:
WARDEN OF B.C.C.F., JOHN DOE #2,, OFC. F. WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN J. DIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. USA
as 2:2024cv01232
Petitioner:
TERRY KELLY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
PRALL v. KUHN et al
as 3:2024cv08778
Defendant:
ALLISON MYERS, GARY M LANIGAN, JOSEPH SANTIAGO and others
Plaintiff:
TORMU E PRALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. KELLY et al
as 1:2024cv07486
Defendant:
MICHAEL KELLY, ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL and CAPTAIN MADLOCK
Plaintiff:
KAREEM BLOCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donahue v. Brittain et al
as 4:2024cv01119
Petitioner:
Kelly B. Donahue
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEVIVO v. KELLY
as 1:2024cv08478
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL R. KELLY
Petitioner:
LISA ANNETTE DEVIVO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joan Cicchiello v. Dauphin County Prison Board, et al
as 24-2081
Defendant:
OFFICER KELLY, GABRIDELA VAN-LIER, DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
JOAN M. CICCHIELLO
Hanzer v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00707
Defendant:
Brian Emig and Kelly Devinney
Plaintiff:
Khalil-Mahlik T Hanzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly-Sizer v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Warden of SCI-Forest
Petitioner:
Nafese Kelly-Sizer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
