Cases 1 - 10 of 21
SPADA v. KERR et al
as 3:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY THOMAS SPADA
Defendant:
J. KERR and SERGEANT PITTSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIPE v. CLEARFIELD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
JEREMY M. SIPE
Defendant:
CLEARFIELD COUNTY JAIL, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., SGT. CHRISTOPHER FOLMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
NIARA BURTON
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, STATE COORDINATOR DAVID RADZIEWICZ, MEDICAL DIRECTOR JOSPH SILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kerr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Frick v. Spiess, et al
as 1:2021cv00959
Defendant:
Charles Rees Brown, Federal Bureau Investigation, Michael Newsome and others
Plaintiff:
John E. Frick
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Allah a/k/a Kerr, Kevin v. Garland et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Petitioner:
Allah a/k/a Kerr, Kevin and Kevin Kerr
Respondent:
Jeffrey Rosen, Merrick Garland and Warden of USP-Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bryan Dickson v. USA, et al
as 17-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LORETTA LYNCH, Atty General, MICHAEL D. TAFELSKI, Regional Counsel and others
PALMER v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00083
Plaintiff:
RYAN S. PALMER
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CORRECTIONS OFFICER KERR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan Dickson v. USA, et al
as 16-3942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN KERR DICKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
