Cases 1 - 10 of 19
William Leak v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 22-3175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEAK
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Leaks, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Paul DeSando, Jeff Troutman, Mike Nelligan, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Leaks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. GREY et al
as 2:2020cv07718
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LEAKE, CORRECTIONS OFFICER DONALD A GREY, LAJUANA R MAJOR and others
Plaintiff:
KEISHAWN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. N.J. STATE PAROLE et al
as 3:2020cv05148
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANDERS L.
Defendant:
N.J. STATE PAROLE and PAROLE OFFICER LEAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANDERS v. N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2018cv05570
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANDERS
Defendant:
N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD, COMBS, STEPHEN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEAK v. CLARK et al
as 2:2017cv02608
Petitioner:
WILLIAM LEAK
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEAK v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED
as 1:2016cv08203
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEAK
Defendant:
NO DEFENDANT LISTED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06494
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK THOMAS LEAKS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAK v. CORRECTION OFFICER LARRY et al
as 2:2015cv07772
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY LEAK
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER LARRY, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAK v. NELSON et al
as 2:2015cv03914
Plaintiff:
JEFF LEAK
Defendant:
KEN NELSON and BRIDGET HOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
