Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Jack v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv01495
Defendant:
Sean McCorkle, McCulley, Suydam and others
Plaintiff:
Nygel Jack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Earnest Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Laurel R. Harry, John Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Ralston et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Woods
Defendant:
George Ralston, Paula Price, Tracie Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Spyker et al
as 1:2023cv01839
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Young
Defendant:
Ms. Spyker, Mr. Kohler, Ms. Loy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Konias, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-2865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH J. KONIAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONALD COLLINGS, LAWRENCE B. LEWIS and others
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
WHITAKER v. SCI-FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
DAMION D. WHITAKER
Defendant:
SCI-FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wilkins v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv02450
Defendant:
Scott W. Walters, John Wetzel, Tom Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2020cv01480
Defendant:
LOIS ALLEN, MARK A. CAPOZZA, INMATE ACCOUNT OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
COREY HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
