Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MANNY v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
ELLIS MANNY and MANNY ELLIS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Antonson v. Clark et al
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant:
Capt. Neipigh, Employees of both DCP and Primecare Meidcal et al, Officer Danner and others
Plaintiff:
Scott D. Antonson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
as 2:2018cv03991
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC , STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. James Loner, Jr.
as 17-3692
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES N. LONER, JR., AKA Manny
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
JAMES v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2015cv05748
Plaintiff:
JAMES JAMES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, CITY OF TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHRIS DOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 10-2939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, RICK KEARNEY, MIKE COSTELLO and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. LITTLE
USA v. Tyrone Smith
as 10-2609
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TYRONE J. SMITH, AKA Manny
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
