Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Redclift v. Schuylkill County et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Sean Redclift
Defendant:
Schuylkill County, Schuylkill County Prison Board, Eugene Berdanier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Ransom
as 2:2019cv03262
Petitioner:
David McGowan
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGowan v. Ransom
as 3:2019cv01180
Petitioner:
David McGowan
Respondent:
Kevin Ransom and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGowan v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00378
Plaintiff:
Christopher Patrick McGowan
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and Officer Reisner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Franklin County Courts et al
as 1:2019cv00426
Petitioner:
Christopher Patrick McGowan
Respondent:
Franklin County Courts and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HEAGY v. CUMRU TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2017cv04394
Plaintiff:
TYLER T. HEAGY
Defendant:
CUMRU TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALFREDO ORTIZ, SCOTT S. SCHMITTINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Baadhio v. Brian Hofacker, et al
as 17-2749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFACKER, Detective, MTPD, SEAN SULLIVAN, Police Officer, MTPD, ROBERT PALMER, Chief of Police and others
Randy Baadhio v. Brian Hofacker, et al
as 17-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFACKER, Detective MTPD, SEAN SULLIVAN, Police Officer, MTPD, ROBERT PALMER, Chief of Police, MTPD and others
SMITH v. RICCARDI et al
as 3:2016cv08260
Plaintiff:
KEITH A. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN A. RICCARDI, PETER E. WARSHAW, VERNON L. MCGOWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
GORDON C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MCGOWAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
