Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Stephany v. Molinaro et al
as 3:2020cv00649
Defendant:
Stephen Molinaro and Joseph Mulligan
Plaintiff:
Jason Stephany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SHIFFLETT v. KORSZNIAK et al
as 2:2016cv06537
Plaintiff:
PAUL SHIFFLETT
Defendant:
KORSZNIAK, CHRISTIAN, GOLSORKHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES et al v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
JOSE TORRES, RAYMOND GOURGUE, ALBARO ALVAREZ and others
Defendant:
NANCY GIROUX, MICHAEL CLARK, BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
RONALD BANKS
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL J. GEHLMANN, BARRY GRUBB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. LANE
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCIANO-APONTE v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv06486
Plaintiff:
BRYAN JESUS LUCIANO-APONTE
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL J. GEHLMANN, ALLEN G. JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM et al
as 3:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
ANDY MOORE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM, DEPUTY GELHMANN, DEPUTY ALLEN JOSPHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MULLIGAN et al
as 3:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
ANDY MOORE
Defendant:
EDWARD MULLIGAN, SUE DARR, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. MULLIGAN et al
as 3:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
ANDY MOORE
Defendant:
EDWARD MULLIGAN, SUE DARR, SUPERINTENDENT ROZUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIGAN v. FOLINO et al
as 1:2012cv00223
Petitioner:
JEREMY RANDELL MULLIGAN
Respondent:
LEWIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
