Cases 1 - 10 of 979
MILLER v. PELESKY et al
as 3:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
MATTHEW R. MILLER
Respondent:
PELESKY and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SOMERSET COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: ALWARD
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. ZANELLI et al
as 5:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. LOMBARDO
Defendant:
AMY ZANELLI, OFFICER ANDREW YOST, ROBERT L. NICKELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD
as 2:2024cv02218
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALWARD
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cave v. Dauphin County Prison
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Cave
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison and Miss Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murrell v. Records et al
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Gregory Murrell
Defendant:
Mike Records, Thelma Charles, Matthew Dutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANNING v. PLATKIN et al
as 2:2024cv06144
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MANNING
Defendant:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, MARCUS OHICKS, PATRICK NOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKSTONE v. PLATKIN et al
as 3:2024cv06127
Petitioner:
CLEVESTER BLACKSTONE
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, N.J. STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, N.J. STATE GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALWARD v. ELKTON FSL et al
as 3:2024cv00806
Petitioner:
Matthew Keith Alward
Respondent:
Elkton FSL and Brian Newell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Petitioner:
Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Respondent:
Mdoc, Washtenaw County Court and Wayne County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
