Cases 1 - 10 of 12
WISOR v. REESE et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
II MICHAEL ALLEN WISOR
Defendant:
GREGORY T. REESE, JESSICA C. SCHWARTZ and ALTOONA PAROLE OFFICE UNIT 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUMP v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL STAFF et al
as 2:2020cv00312
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL STAFF, MCCF SECURITTY OFFICERS, PRIME CARE MEDICAL DOCTORS AND NURSES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN TRUMP, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WONDERLING v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OFPROBATION & PAROLE
as 2:2014cv00023
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN WONDERLING
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OFPROBATION & PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Quiggle v. Coleman, et al
as 11-4418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLEN QUIGGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN COLEMAN, Superintendent and ATTY GEN PA
Quiggle v. Coleman et al
as 1:2011cv01107
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Quiggle
Respondent:
Coleman and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quiggle v. Coleman et al
as 1:2011cv00652
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Quiggle
Respondent:
Superintendent Coleman and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Thomas v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 09-3473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALLEN THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND SOBINA, SUPERINTENDENT SCI ALBION, PA, ATTY GEN PA, THOMAS CORBETT and DA LACKAWANNA CTY
Harris v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00193
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Harris, Sr.
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv00624
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant:
MICHAEL ALLEN RICKS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RICKS v. BYRNES et al
as 1:2009cv00473
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN RICKS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH BYRNES, SUSAN KIEFFER, JOHN FEHLNER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
