Cases 1 - 10 of 31
MENDEZ v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv21659
Petitioner:
RUDI RENE MENDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MENDEZ v. ACTING WARDEN CRUZ
as 1:2023cv16612
Petitioner:
RUDI MENDEZ
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mendoza v. USA
as 3:2023cv00681
Petitioner:
Rudy Mendoza
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAVERAS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv06163
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Plaintiff:
RUDY TAVERAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUDY v. JOHN DOE et al
as 1:2018cv10387
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHN RUDY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, N.J. D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2017cv01152
Petitioner:
RUDY DAVIS
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARVEY v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE et al
as 1:2017cv04648
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND D HARVEY
Defendant:
DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, MATTHEW MASSING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Brookins v. Bristol Township Police Depart, et al
as 15-2632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DAVID BROOKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALDRED H. EASTLACK, RUDOLPH RUDY HEIERLING and others
MENDOZA v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv00191
Petitioner:
RUDY MENDOZA
Respondent:
BRIAN H. THOMPSON and REBECCA CALISTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
