Cases 1 - 10 of 26
ROJAS v. FBOP et al
as 1:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ROJAS
Defendant:
FBOP, FCI FORT DIX WARDEN and DHS DEPARMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2023cv23002
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY M. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR, DEPUTY WARDEN REBECCA FRANCESCHINI, SGT. LISA ROJAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILBERT v. FRANCESCHINI et al
as 1:2023cv22633
Plaintiff:
JIHAD A. GILBERT
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN REBECCA FRANCESCHINI, WARDEN KAREN TAYLOR, SGT. LISA ROJAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ROJAS-GARCIA v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03299
Petitioner:
TYRON ROJAS-GARCIA
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEILIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
MORGAN NEILIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROJAS v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv16006
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. ROJAS
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, TRISH C., MARLEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2019cv20906
Defendant:
DET. DANIEL CHOE, PROSECUTORS OFFICE, DET. JOSE RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIAR ROJAS CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Jacques
as 5:2019cv00325
Petitioner:
Hector Rodriguez, Rojas and Victor Rojas
Respondent:
Warden I. Jacques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROJAS v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2018cv00371
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BURTON, SERGEANT RICHTER and LIEUTENANT NEWMAN
Plaintiff:
PETER ROJAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
