Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Miguel Martinez v. J. Rivello, et al
as 22-2518
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN RIVELLO, Superintendent SCI Huntingdon, K. KAUFFMAN, Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon, J. SPYKER, Deputy Superintendent Specialized Services and others
Martinez v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01908
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01840
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01608
Defendant:
Jill Spylher, Paula Price, A. Scalia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker and Maurice Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv01608
Defendant:
Jill Spylher, Paula Price, A. Scalia and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker and Maurice Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON-PRICE v. WALTERS et al
as 2:2018cv01580
Petitioner:
NEAL JACKSON-PRICE and NEAL JACKSON
Defendant:
MANAGER M. CIAVARELLA
Respondent:
Deputy S. WALTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tracy Bradley v. Harris, et al
as 17-3497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY R. BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN HARRIS, of Security, J. ECKARD, LIEUTENANT HOUSE, Security and others
WALTERS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06150
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH S. WALTERS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Eckard et al
as 1:2015cv01411
Plaintiff:
Arnold J. Harris
Defendant:
J. A. Eckard, B. Hollibaugh and W. S. Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02455
Plaintiff:
Kevin Powell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, T. Bickell, James A. Eckard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
