Cases 1 - 10 of 17
DAVIS v. THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2020cv01745
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv08265
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2018cv00450
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY and OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagan et al v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Damont Hagan, Raphael Spearman and Thomas Davis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, Tabb Bickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2017cv00861
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and S.C.I. MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. WARDEN, S.C.I. MERCER
as 2:2014cv01387
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
WARDEN, S.C.I. MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. THE WARDEN OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MERCER
as 2:2014cv00271
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
THE WARDEN OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. County of Allegheny, et al
as 12-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, and its Agencies, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
DAVIS v. THOMPSON
as 2:2012cv00061
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. THE WARDEN OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2010cv00538
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
THE WARDEN OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and THE SUPERINTENDENT OF S.C.I. MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
