Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00048
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Dennis Obado v. United States Federal Governme, et al
as 17-2926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS OBADO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dennis Obado v. United States Government, et al
as 17-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS OBADO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
GRANT v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
as 3:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
ANDRE EVERTON GRANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
QUATTARA v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
as 2:2012cv00263
Petitioner:
BOURAHIMA QUATTARA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DORCANT v. DHS/ICE et al
as 3:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
HUBERT DORCANT
Defendant:
DHS/ICE, ERIC HOLDER and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
