Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Warner v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
William T. Warner
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, Bernadette Mason, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Webb, Jr. v. Department of Justice, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RENEE HRIVNAK, Deputy Attorney General for Department of Justice and others
WARNER v. DEGNER
as 1:2023cv21631
Plaintiff:
MARK M. WARNER
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEGNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARNER v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv03934
Petitioner:
ASHLEY WARNER
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Webb Jr. v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
William J Webb Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States Postal Service, Renee Hrivnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batty, Jr. v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Petitioner:
Warner Ervin Batty, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon, Dr. Laurel Harry and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: WARNER, SR.
as 2:2022cv00985
In Re:
EQUAN J. WARNER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Harry et al
as 4:2021cv01052
Defendant:
Officer J. Kiner, James Barnacle, Beth Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Barry George Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULMER v. WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01683
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE LAMONT CULMET and ANTOINE LAMONT CULMER
Defendant:
WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WARNER v. USA
as 2:2020cv00288
Plaintiff:
EARL D. WARNER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
