Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 85,403
Carter v. DOC Bureau Grievance Officer et al
as 1:2024mc00289
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: DOC Bureau Grievance Officer and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WASHINGTON
as 1:2024cv00165
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Respondent: WARDEN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv00166
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BAEZ v. MCCULLOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN BAEZ
Defendant: STACI M. MCCULLOUGH, JONATHAN MATSON and TWELVE JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynoso v. Greene
as 1:2024cv00967
Petitioner: Yeffry Reynoso
Respondent: J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brennan v. Monroe County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00966
Plaintiff: Andrew Patrick Brennan
Defendant: Monroe County Correctional Facility, Warden Garry Haidle, Director of Treatment Lea Baylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD
as 3:2024cv00972
Plaintiff: Matthew Alward
Defendant: Fci Oxford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Druck v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI
as 24-2045
Plaintiff: GEORGE DRUCK
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Donte Cannon v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-2074
Plaintiff: DONTE CANNON
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
DE LIMA v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06925
Petitioner: PEDRO VICIOSO DE LIMA
Respondent: WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?