Cases 31 - 40 of 108
ACOSTA v. BUB, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00168
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
BENEDICT VALENO and BUB, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. VICDANIA HEALTH SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
DANETTE MOORE and VICDANIA HEALTH SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. Howard et al
as 2:2018cv15722
Defendant:
Eastern Terminals & Communications, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, Eastern Terminals & Communications, Inc. Retirement Plan, Radow J Howard and others
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ACOSTA v. VIHAR BENSALEM LP et al
as 2:2018cv05469
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
HANSA PATEL and VIHAR BENSALEM LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. APEX HOOD EXHAUST AND FIRE GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01611
Defendant:
BRYAN PAINTER and APEX HOOD EXHAUST AND FIRE GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. VIHAR F W LP et al
as 2:2018cv05392
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
VIHAR F W LP, RAMESH PATEL and RAVI VERMA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Local 1940, United Steel Workers International Union
as 1:2018cv02124
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Local 1940, United Steel Workers International Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
ROLANDO CUN v. DGNY GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2018cv14951
Plaintiff:
MARIO ROLANDO CUN
Defendant:
ALEXANDER DURAN and DGNY GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. COMPREHENSIVE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01608
Defendant:
SOUTH HILLS OPERATIONS LLC, MURRYSVILLE OPERATIONS LLC, CHMS GROUP LLC and others
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ACOSTA v. MAKASI et al
as 2:2018cv16465
Plaintiff:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
Defendant:
ROBERT JESTINOS MAKASI and KUDZAI MASIIWA MAKASI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
