Cases 1 - 10 of 20
CAIRNES v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2024cv02162
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP also known as UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA doing business as UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN CAIRNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
KRALL v. EQUITABLE FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv02883
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. KRALL
Defendant:
EQUITABLE FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BLOOM v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2021cv00309
Plaintiff:
ELANA J. BLOOM
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SM MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al v. UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2020cv13685
Defendant:
KEMPER HEALTH, A DIVISION OF RESERVE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, WEBTPA, AN AMWINS GROUP COMPANY, CLAIMS MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Plaintiff:
NEC ORANGE EMERGENCY : CENTER, LP, NEC HARLINGEN EMERGENCY CENTER, LP, NEC BEAUMONT EMERGENCY CENTER, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAMAR v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2019cv04177
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LAMAR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HERSHAN v. UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv06120
Plaintiff:
CLYDE A. HERSHAN
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HEINTZINGER et al v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2014cv01289
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HEINTZINGER and MARK DUERSTEIN
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
D'AGOSTINO v. UNUM GROUP
as 1:2014cv04028
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA D'AGOSTINO
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
AYALON v. THE UNUM GROUP et al
as 2:2014cv03819
Plaintiff:
DAN AYALON
Defendant:
THE UNUM GROUP and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
WATT-MORSE v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2012cv01086
Plaintiff:
MARGARET WATT-MORSE
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
