Cases 91 - 100 of 235
Pearson v. Commissioner
as 1:2014cv01400
Plaintiff:
Charles William Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
TIMPER v. REINECKER et al
as 2:2014cv04079
Plaintiff:
ALLISON TIMPER
Defendant:
SCOTT E. REINECKER, REINECKER REAL ESTATE, PHI KAPPA FRATERNITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC.
as 2:2014cv03383
Plaintiff:
NEIL SMITH , STEPHONE PAIGE , PAULA PAIGE and others
Defendant:
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORDON v. PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
as 2:2014cv02329
Plaintiff:
JOEL GORDON
Defendant:
PEARSON EDUCATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
FOUNTAINE et al v. CORPORATION MCKESSON et al
as 2:2014cv02020
Plaintiff:
JAMES LA FOUNTAINE , EARL LAYNE , DANIEL LEBLANC and others
Defendant:
CORPORATION MCKESSON and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CENGAGE LEARNING, INC et al v. CHIZMAR et al
as 2:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
CENGAGE LEARNING, INC and PEARSON EDUCATION, INC
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. CHIZMAR and CAMPUS BOOKSTORE, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GARRETT v. WEXFORD HEALTH et al
as 3:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
KAREEM GARRETT
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH, DR. NAJI, DEBRA J. YOUNKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Wexford Health et al
as 3:2014cv00250
Plaintiff:
Kareem Garrett
Defendant:
Wexford Health, Dr. Naji, Debra J Younkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
