Cases 101 - 110 of 422
John Preacher v. Brian Hyde, et al
as 21-1591
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN HYDE, DR. SANTOS, DR. KROSS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DALE PREACHER
Johnson v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00516
Defendant:
Dr. Fernando Tejeda, John Wetzel, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Aquil Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tyrone Martin v. Secretary Pennsylvania Departm, et al
as 21-1522
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, MELISSA ROSS and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE MARTIN
Gabriel Pittman v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-1486
Defendant:
REBECCA RIEFER, P. NUNEZ, BARRY SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Anthony Caiby v. Tammy Ferguson, et al
as 21-1427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY V. CAIBY
Defendant / Appellee:
GINA CLARK, Major of Unit Management, GEORGE MEINTEL, Dept. Superintendent Treatment, TAMMY FERGUSON, Superintendent and others
MOTZER v. WELLPATH
as 2:2021cv00539
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, STEPHEN D. WIENER, D.O. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADDISON v. WELLPATH
as 2:2021cv00168
Defendant:
WELLPATH and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
RAYMEL ADDISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAHAM v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00146
Defendant:
JANE DOE, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
IVY v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2021cv00061
Defendant:
WELLPATH, CNRP LESLIE, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
GLAVIN IVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARPER v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Wellpath, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and John/Jane Doe(S)
Plaintiff:
Parris Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
