Cases 101 - 110 of 324
Phillip Thompson v. Tammy Ferguson, et al
as 19-3517
Defendant:
CERT TEAM, John Does, MANDY SIPPLE, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON
Smart v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2019cv01783
Petitioner:
Fabian D. Smart
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04580
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04521
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, SMART COMMUNICATIONS, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. HINES, III.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv03455
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MANDY SIPPLE, C.E.R.T. TEAM, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Robinson, et al v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 19-2334
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL and SMART COMMUNICATION, Sued in their private & official capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS ROBINSON and WILLIAM HULL
O'Shea v. Smart & Final Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01003
Defendant:
Smart & Final Stores, Inc., Dennis T. Gies, Joseph S. Tesoriero and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas O'Shea
Smart Locking Technologies LLC v. Igloohome Inc.
as 1:2019cv00992
Defendant:
Igloohome Inc.
Plaintiff:
Smart Locking Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Smart Locking Technologies LLC v. Schlage Lock Company LLC
as 1:2019cv00994
Plaintiff:
Smart Locking Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Schlage Lock Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Smart Locking Technologies LLC v. LockState, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00993
Defendant:
LockState, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Smart Locking Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
