Cases 131 - 140 of 1,123
JOHNSON v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2021cv04744
Petitioner:
OMAR JOHNSON
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lundy v. Lenning et al
as 3:2021cv01767
Plaintiff:
Steven Love Lundy and Steven Love Lundy Trust
Defendant:
Kenneth Lenning, Matthew Nero, E. David Chtristine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. HOUSER et al
as 2:2021cv05176
Petitioner:
DWAYNE HILL
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAKER v. CROOKUS et al
as 2:2021cv04615
Plaintiff:
KEEGAN GABRIEL BAKER
Defendant:
CO' CROOKUS, CO' STRAWTHER, SGT. STEWART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORRIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
DEREYK L MORRIS and DEREYK L. MORRIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHEN BUZAS, CAPTAIN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
OLMO v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv04333
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL OLMO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON, WELLPATH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Houser et al
as 3:2021cv01887
Petitioner:
Emanuel Rivera
Respondent:
Morris L. Houser, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BELL v. HOUSER et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Petitioner:
CARL EDWARD BELL
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
