Cases 11 - 20 of 42
NICHOLS v. LOPPE et al
as 2:2019cv02264
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STARKEY, SARAH BOWLES, JAMES MATTERA and others
Plaintiff:
RONELL NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00727
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00726
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
STARKEY v. MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv02336
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STARKEY
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC., ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOFAN JUNIOR v. PEREKSTA et al
as 3:2016cv08559
Plaintiff:
HENRY SAYE GOFAN JUNIOR
Defendant:
DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, THOMAS M. BROWN, EDWARD A. BELMOUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Schock, et al v. James Baker, et al
as 16-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT SCHOCK, WOLDEMAR SCHOCK and IRMA SCHOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. BAKER, JEFFREY STARKEY, ANTHONY KNISELY and others
STARKEY v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2016cv00803
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA RAYE STARKEY
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER PHARMA AG and BAYER OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dejesus et al v. The State of Delaware et al
as 1:2015cv01065
Plaintiff:
Orlando DeJesus and Paulette DeJesus
Defendant:
The State of Delaware, Todd Drace, John Kirlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STARKEY v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01001
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH STARKEY
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
