Cases 11 - 20 of 31
OJO v. ESSEX COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv11357
Defendant:
CHARLES GREEN, ECCF DOE #1-10 and ESSEX COUNTY
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. HUDSON COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv11360
Defendant:
RONALD P. EDWARDS, WOODLEY, D'ANDREA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. CORECIVIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv11362
Defendant:
CORECIVIC, INC., ERIKA GONZALEZ, SANDRA TUTLER and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. BERGEN COUNTY, et al
as 2:2021cv11359
Defendant:
MICHAEL TSIOLAS, STEVEN AHRENDT, P. ALLEGRETTA and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OJO v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19726
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
REBECCA OJO
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ojo v. Decker et al
as 2:2020cv05538
Defendant:
Corecivic, Inc., Paul Borke, Thomas Michael Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ojo et al v. Brew Vino LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00661
Defendant:
Jordan Lyle Chronister, Steve Chronister, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Ann Crosby and Myneca Y. Ojo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olukayode Ojo v. Warden Elizabeth Detention Ctr
as 20-1816
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ELIZABETH DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00949
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
OJO v. HUDSON COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, FSB. et al
as 2:2019cv16200
Plaintiff:
SANDRA OJO
Defendant:
NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES, BANK OF AMERICA N.A., MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
