Cases 11 - 20 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Screen v. Soclean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Randolph Screen
Defendant:
SoClean Inc and SOCLEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JUSTICE, II v. RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP, INC., JEFFREY STROBURG, RANDOLPH L. HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
REID et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05108
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY REID, AARON JONES, CHRISTOPHER RONEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dent v. Randolph
as 1:2021cv01814
Plaintiff:
Preston Dent
Defendant:
Samira Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
JONES v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03314
Plaintiff:
DANITA JONES
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, SMART SALES AND LEASE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JUSTICE, II v. CORE-MARK HOLDING COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03584
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
CORE-MARK HOLDING COMPANY, INC., SCOTT E MCPHERSON, ROCKY DEWBRE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Justice, II v. MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv02844
Defendant:
WALTER J ASPATORE, JOSEPH D GAREA, RANDOLPH C PASCHKE and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Stephens et al v. Lin et al
as 3:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
Randolph Stephens and Wendy Stephens
Defendant:
Hongyu Lin and Lin Trading Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
