Cases 11 - 20 of 477
BUSHANSKY v. VWR CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv02616
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
VWR CORPORATION , MANUEL A.H. BROCKE-BENZ , HARRY M. JANSEN KRAEMER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
USA v. Allie Speight
as 16-3529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALLIE SPEIGHT, a/k/a Allie Speights a/k/a A.H. Speight
A.H. by and through her Parent, K.P. v. Colonial School District
as 1:2016cv00726
Plaintiff:
A.H. by and through her Parent, K.P.
Defendant:
Colonial School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT v. A.H.
as 1:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
A.H.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Corey Harris v. Greater Erie Community Action, et al
as 16-2688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY L. HARRIS, CH'S Service Provider and Children, C.H., Jr., B.H., A.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
GREATER ERIE COUNTY ACTION COMMITTEE, GEGAC EMPLOYMENT TRAINING AND EDUCATION DIVISION WORKFORCE 2001, PENNSYLVANIA CAREER LINK WORKFORCE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDWIN v. JUBILEE et al
as 1:2015cv03130
Plaintiff:
JULIUS A.H. BALDWIN, IV
Defendant:
ERNEST JUBILEE, PETER CALABRESE, JOHN DEVLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
