Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ABBEY et al v. BAYER CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv03409
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA ABBEY , JENNIFER ABEYTA , CHRISTINE ACCETTURA and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Santiago-Aguilera v. Davis-Young Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
Jorge Santiago-Aguilera
Defendant:
Davis-Young Associates, Inc. and Harleysville Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Santiago-Aguilera v. State of DE/ Dept of Labor et al
as 1:2015cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jorge Santiago-Aguilera
Defendant:
State of DE/ Dept of Labor, Harleysville Insurance Company and Davis-Young Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
AGUILERA et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04089
Plaintiff:
ALICE AGUILERA
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aguilera-Quinjano v. USA
as 4:2015cv00160
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Freddie Aguilera-Quinjano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AGUILERA v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00947
Plaintiff:
MARIA AGUILERA
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Freddie Aguilera-Quinjano v. Howard Hufford, et al
as 12-3581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE AGUILERA-QUINJANO
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD HUFFORD and ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Quinjano v. Hufford et al
as 3:2011cv02254
Petitioner:
Freddy Aguilera Quinjano
Respondent:
Howard Hufford and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
