Cases 11 - 20 of 37
WEST MOTOR FREIGHT, INC. v. BAN WAGON EXPRESS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv14296
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10 and BAN WAGON EXPRESS, LLC
Plaintiff:
WEST MOTOR FREIGHT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741
SEAWRIGHT v. BANNING et al
as 2:2018cv04811
Defendant:
OFFICER PATRICK BANNING and JOHN JOHN/JANE DOE OFFICERS 1-7
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SEAWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANS v. DAIICHI SANKYO INC. et al
as 1:2018cv08245
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA BANS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO INC., DAIICHI SANKYO US HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WESTON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02432
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WESTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, DIDONATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MELLOW et al
as 2:2016cv01638
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MAMMIE MELLOW and MELLON BAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS et al
as 2:2016cv01327
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
BAN O RAIL ROADS CORPRACTIONS OWNERS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRACTION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
CHESTER BRAME
Defendant:
BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMM v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2015cv01517
Petitioner:
ANCELL EUGENE HAMM
Respondent:
BARAK OBAMA and BAN KI-MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DELVILA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2015cv02521
Plaintiff:
JUAN DELVILA , JUAN SOLER , TONY MASON and others
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CRUZ et al v. HULMES et al
as 2:2015cv02234
Plaintiff:
JOEL CRUZ , ADALERTO MORALES RODRIGUEZ and JOSHUA MORALES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES, JAMES REILLY, PATRICK BANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
